Skip to main content

Data / Grassroots Coaching · Refreshed weekly

What grassroots football coaches actually plan, ask, and reflect on

An open dataset drawn from four sources — FootballGPT, CoachPage, CoachReflect and the FCA Skool community. Aggregate-only; no coach, club, or session is identifiable. Last refresh: 04 May 2026.

Coaches
1,152
Questions logged
14,824
Animated practices
7,125
Data sources
4
FGPT · CoachPage · CoachReflect · FCA

Chart 1 / drill-and-cone problem

What practice types grassroots coaches generate by age band

The youngest players get the most isolated drill-work.

Mini-soccer coaches (U6-U9) ask AI for 87.9% technical drills. Only 7.2% are small-sided games — the format kids actually learn from. Technical-drill bias falls as players get older; tactical work scales correctly with age. Game-based learning sits under 7% at every age band.

n = 7,114 categorised drills with age band. Bands with fewer than 50 drills hidden. methodology

Chart 2 / planning rhythm

When grassroots football coaches plan their training week

Tuesday, not Sunday, is grassroots planning night.

Practice generation peaks on Tuesday and Monday evenings — coaches plan their week early, not last-minute. The busiest hour is 8pm UTC.

036912151821
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat

Hours shown in UTC, every third hour labelled. Darker = more drills generated.

n = 7,125 drills. methodology

Chart 3 / audience mix

Who actually uses football coaching AI tools

More than one in four queries comes from a Football Manager video-game player.

Real grassroots coaches make up the majority of activity, but Football Manager video-game players are the second-largest audience — sharing the same tool with very different intent.

Coach9,693 (65.4%)
Football Manager (video game)3,633 (24.5%)
Player1,167 (7.9%)
Scout183 (1.2%)
Goalkeeper coach148 (1%)

n = 14,824 mode-tagged queries. Modes with fewer than 50 hidden. methodology

Chart 4 / age band distribution

Most-coached age groups in grassroots football

Teenagers, not under-9s, are the most-coached age band.

The 'grassroots = wee kids' assumption is wrong. Senior Youth and Junior bands account for over half of all drill volume; Mini-soccer is the third smallest band by activity.

n = 7,114 drills with assignable age band. methodology

Cut 5 / pitch concentration

85%

Almost every animated practice puts the action in the middle third.

Coaches across every age band design overwhelmingly in the middle of the pitch. Defensive-third practice (own-goal-line work) is rare. Attacking-third (final-third finishing) is also under-served. Computed from the average y-coordinate of all players in each drill.

Mini (U6-U9)n = 883
3%Defensive third85%Middle third12%Attacking third
Junior (U10-U12)n = 1,795
2%Defensive third85%Middle third13%Attacking third
Youth (U13-U15)n = 1,640
2%Defensive third84%Middle third14%Attacking third
Senior Youth (U16-U18)n = 1,831
2%Defensive third86%Middle third12%Attacking third

n = 7,114 drills with at least one player. Pitch thirds are computed from each drill's average player y-coordinate (0-100, where 0 is the defending goal line). 'Middle' covers y=33-66.

Cut 6 / player counts

87%

Of Mini-soccer practices use 5 or fewer players — the format kids learn best in.

At the smallest age band coaches do design appropriately small. The story changes higher up: Adult coaches favour 8v8+ work; Senior Youth split fairly evenly between 2v2 and full-format. Each cell is the count of practices with that team size at that age band.

1v12v2-3v34v4-5v56v6-7v78v8+total
Mini (U6-U9)
77
401
292
101
12
883
Junior (U10-U12)
139
628
615
316
97
1,795
Youth (U13-U15)
103
432
432
413
260
1,640
Senior Youth (U16-U18)
88
460
508
394
381
1,831
Adult (U19+)
39
180
173
167
259
818
Mixed
6
63
42
14
22
147

n = 7,114 drills with both age band and player count. Player count is derived from drill_data.players[]; bands are 1v1, 2v2-3v3, 4v4-5v5, 6v6-7v7, 8v8+.

Cut 7 / cohort profile

88%

Mini-soccer's category profile is technical-dominant — every other band balances out.

Each polygon shows category share within an age band. Mini-soccer (red) collapses on the technical axis; older bands fan out across tactical, game-based, set-piece and warm-up. The shape difference is the story.

Mini (U6-U9)Junior (U10-U12)Youth (U13-U15)Senior Youth (U16-U18)

Categories: technical, tactical, game-based, set-piece, warm-up, physical. Each axis is the band's share of practices in that category. Bands plotted: Mini, Junior, Youth, Senior Youth (top 4 by volume). methodology

Cut 9 / animation complexity

3.2 → 3.7steps

Practice complexity barely scales with age.

Average sequence step count per drill (each 'step' is one phase of the animation). Mini practices average ~3 steps; Adult barely reaches 4. Either coaches genuinely want short drills regardless of age, or the AI tends to produce a similar number of steps regardless of prompt.

Adult (U19+)
3.52 steps · n=818
Junior (U10-U12)
3.36 steps · n=1,795
Mini (U6-U9)
3.23 steps · n=883
Mixed
3.67 steps · n=147
Senior Youth (U16-U18)
3.30 steps · n=1,831
Youth (U13-U15)
3.44 steps · n=1,640

Deep cuts / FootballGPT

Underneath the four anchor charts

The same FootballGPT data, sliced more ways: what topics coaches are asking about, which features they use most, the formations they pick by team format, the techniques they analyse, the languages they study, and the qualifications they hold.

Questions answered
50,000+
Practices created
1000+
Countries
30+
Positive feedback
7%

Cut A / topics

What coaches are asking about

Twelve coaching topics detected by keyword match across every chat query. A single query may match more than one topic.

All topics

General Coaching
33%
Formations & Tactics
15%
Session Planning
13%
Pressing & Defending
11%
Passing & Possession
9%
Shooting & Finishing
4%
Dribbling & 1v1
3%
Physical & Conditioning
3%
Goalkeeping
3%
Set Pieces
3%

Top topics — grassroots

General Coaching
32%
Formations & Tactics
15%
Session Planning
14%
Pressing & Defending
11%
Passing & Possession
10%

Top topics — academy

General Coaching
57%
Pressing & Defending
14%
Session Planning
6%
Formations & Tactics
4%
Shooting & Finishing
3%

Top topics — professional

Passing & Possession
29%
General Coaching
29%
Formations & Tactics
14%
Pressing & Defending
7%
Shooting & Finishing
7%

Cut B / tools

Which tools coaches use

FootballGPT exposes a dozen specialised tools alongside chat. Share of total tool events:

AI Chat
50%
Drill Creator
21%
FM Tactics
6%
Match Prep
5%
FM Screenshot
5%
FM Wonderkids
2%
Session Scanner
2%
Photo To Drill
2%

Cut C / formations

Formations coaches actually pick

Coaches state their preferred formation in their profile or pick one in match-prep. Shown by team format.

11v11

4-3-3
37%
4-4-2
17%
4-2-3-1
10%
3-5-2
10%
3-4-1
10%

9v9

4-4-2
50%
4-2-3-1
50%

5v5

2-1-1
100%

Cut D / who they are

Demographics from FootballGPT profiles

Self-stated by users in their FootballGPT profile. Where percentages don't sum to 100, the underlying field is multi-select or partially populated.

Years coaching

6-10 Years
47%
0-2 Years
46%
3-5 Years
3%
10+ Years
3%

Qualifications held

None - Just Starting Out
33%
FA Level 1
13%
FA Level 2
13%
FA Level 4 (UEFA A)
10%
FA Level 3 (UEFA B)
9%
First Aid Certified
4%
FA Level 5 (UEFA Pro)
3%
UEFA A
3%

Team formats coached

11v11
71%
9v9
10%
7v7
9%
5v5
9%

How they use the tool

Coach
83%
Fm
10%
Player
6%
Scout
1%
Goalkeeper
0%

Cut E / techniques & languages

Skills coaches analyse, languages they study

Technique-analyser uploads (which skill)

Passing
32%
Shooting
21%
Ball-Mastery
21%
Dribbling
14%
Defending
7%
Heading
4%

Football Lingo languages studied · 70% average accuracy

Es
67%
Fr
33%

Cut F / keywords

What words show up in the practice prompts

Top tokens extracted from the prompts coaches send to the practice generator. Stop-words and the words "drill" / "practice" are filtered out.

sessiongameplanmatchtheirplayersformationtacticalattackingopponentstrategythreats

Cross-product

Coaching qualifications, post-session reflections and community discussion

The charts above come from FootballGPT — what coaches ASK AI for. The three below pull from CoachPage (who coaches ARE), CoachReflect (what coaches THINK after sessions), and the FCA Skool community (what coaches publicly DISCUSS). Different products, different cohorts, different lenses on the same population.

Chart 5 / who coaches actually are

From CoachPage: licence, country, years coaching, age groups, specialities

FootballGPT shows what coaches ask AI for. CoachPage shows who they are. Each coach who builds a public CoachPage states their licence, country, years coaching, the age groups they teach, and the specialities they list.

Coaches
13
Licensed
3
Countries
3

Licence band

UEFA B
2
Performance / S&C
2
FA Level 2
1
Futsal
1
Goalkeeping
1
Other
1
Other course
1
Coerver
1
UEFA C
1
FA Level 1
1

Years coaching

3-5 years
1
6-10 years
1
11-15 years
2

Country

Unspecified
10
Nigeria
1
UK
1
Australia
1

Age groups taught

U14
4
U16
4
Senior
3
U12
3
U18
2
U15
2
U13
2
U7
2
U9
2
U17
2

Stated specialities

Head Coach
4
Assistant Coach
2
Attacking
2
Strength & Conditioning
2
Team Manager
1
Match Analysis
1
Youth Development
1
Set Pieces
1

n = 13 directory-visible coaches. Cohort is below the k≥50 anonymity floor used elsewhere on this page — counts published as raw figures with the source named explicitly. Source: coachpa.ge. Coaches teaching multiple age groups appear in each band.

Chart 6 / what coaches reflect on

CoachReflect feed temporarily unavailable. Refreshes hourly.

Chart 7 / what coaches publicly discuss

FCA Skool feed temporarily unavailable. Refreshes hourly.

FAQ

Common questions about grassroots coaching, answered from the data

Each answer below is grounded in the live numbers shown above, refreshed weekly. Where the underlying cohort is small, the answer says so.

What do grassroots football coaches focus on most?

Across 14,824 coaching questions logged in FootballGPT, the most common topic is General Coaching at 33%. Technical drills also dominate practice generation — 87.9% for U6-U9, falling to 70.9% for adult football.

see the chart →

What practice types work best for U6, U7, U8, U9?

In our data, 87.9% of practices coaches generate for U6-U9 are technical drills, only 7.2% are small-sided games. Most coaching guidance for this age band recommends the reverse — game-based learning is how children actually internalise football. The data shows the gap between guidance and practice.

see the chart →

When do grassroots football coaches plan their training week?

Tuesday and Monday evenings dominate. The peak hour is 8pm UTC. Sunday-night planning, despite the stereotype, is not the busiest slot. Coaches plan early in the week, not last-minute.

see the chart →

What age group is the most-coached in grassroots football?

Senior Youth (U16-U18) and Junior (U10-U12) are the largest bands by practice volume. Mini-soccer (U6-U9) is the third smallest. The "grassroots = wee kids" assumption does not hold up. Largest band: Senior Youth (U16-U18) at 1,831 animated practices.

see the chart →

Are grassroots coaches the same audience as Football Manager players?

No. Of 14,824 mode-tagged queries, 65.4% come from coach mode and 24.5% from Football Manager video-game mode. They share the same AI tooling but with very different intent. Roughly one in four queries to a "football coaching AI" comes from someone playing the FM video game.

see the chart →

What questions do grassroots coaches ask AI most?

Topic detection across every query: General Coaching (33%), Formations & Tactics (15%), Session Planning (13%), Pressing & Defending (11%), Passing & Possession (9%). A single query can match more than one topic.

see the chart →

What licence do most grassroots football coaches hold?

Among 1,152 contributing coaches, qualification mix on CoachPage shows UEFA B, FA Level 1/2, Coerver, S&C and others. The cohort is small (~13 directory-visible coaches today) so the distribution is indicative rather than statistical.

see the chart →

What do football coaches reflect on after sessions?

From CoachReflect: top tags coaches attach to their post-session reflections include player_development, session_planning, tactical, communication, technique. Free-text reflection content is never published — only structured tags and ratings.

see the chart →

What do grassroots coaches publicly discuss in coaching communities?

From the FCA community: session design is the most-discussed theme this snapshot. The next most common are player management, community chat, tools and resources. Themes refreshed weekly from a fixed 13-bucket taxonomy.

see the chart →

How many football coaches contributed to this dataset?

1,152 distinct grassroots coaches generated the 7,125 animated practices in this dataset, alongside 14,824 logged questions. The dataset refreshes weekly.

see the chart →

Use the data

All charts are aggregate. No row-level data, no PII, no club or coach identifiers — ever. For interviews, additional cuts, or a press-ready summary, get in touch.